|
Home
Articles
News
Find
Us
Rules
Join
Us
Gallery

| |
Blue water, Big Game Lure Tactics.
Copyright. Gareth Lewis, November 2002.
©
No, I am not talking about 35 foot, 500HP, and 30 knot
charter boats, based in the tropics. Complete with 80lb class stand up sticks,
reels containing half a mile of suitable line, and released fish tagging
equipment. However, if a suitable TV show producer or sponsor would like to talk
about such things, please contact me.
It is a known fact that Pike are cannibals, which are
capable of grabbing and then eating prey which is up 25-30% of their size. Over
the last three or four months I have been row trolling, large lures designed for
Big game species, such as Marlin, Sailfish and Tuna. The rivers I have been
trolling on, are only around 60ft (17metres) wide, with an average depth of
about 8 &1/2 feet (2.5 metres). My boat is an oar powered 12ft plywood Jon
boat.
The reason it is oar powered is because A) I do not own
either a petrol or electric motor (yet). B) Trolling under motor power is not
permitted on most UK waterways and lakes. So far this year I have captured Pike
to 12lbs on these large lures. Interestingly I have had Pike in the 15lb plus
bracket follow the large lures, but never take one. I have also grown accustomed
to trolling these large lures, as an interesting interlude while I row between
favourite hot spots.
When I reach these areas I then switch back to traditional
cast and retrieve techniques, using more traditional 2-5 inch minnow type lures.
The large lures that I am using are 12 inch (30cm), 16 inch (40cm) and 18 inch
(45cm), Green Mackerel and Blue Mackerel minnow type lures. These lures are
wooden, wired through floating divers without a built in rattle. I purchased
them, when I was on a recent family vacation in Gran Canaria. They cost from €16
to €22 each or about £10.50-£15.00 ($16-$22). I have no idea who makes them,
but they look like a cross between a Rapala CD magnum, and a Hi-fin trophy
Magnum minnow. They were just hanging from pegs, without any packaging, or
markings with just a price label attached to them, in the charter boat booking
office. They are strong and tough lures, because earlier that day I had boated
an estimated 350lb (160Kgs) Blue Marlin on a rather battered one supplied by the
charter boat. The hooks, although suitable for large, hard fighting blue water
species, were not suitable for Pike fishing on small rivers. Barbaric and only
fit for anchoring aircraft carriers and oil tankers sprang to mind. I changed
the three treble hooks on each lure, for what I thought to be a more acceptable
size 1/0 trebles. The eye of the 1/0 trebles would not fit on the split rings
fitted to the lure. Standard 3/8 inch (10mm) diameter split rings would not fit
on to the hook hangers, so I fixed these on to the heavy duty split rings
already attached to the lure. Then I fitted the 1/0 trebles to the 3/8 inch
split rings. Because of the length, and weight of the lures (6-9 ounces).
I had already reasoned that casting them with a my
heaviest rod, which has a maximum casting weight of 2 ounces and then trolling
off the rod tip was out of the question. So I made a trolling clip from a
stationery Bulldog clip and a cheap G clamp. The jaws of the bulldog clip had a
piece of small bore plastic tube glued to them, to prevent line damage. This
allowed the line to be held in the clip's jaws, when trolling, but releasing
from the clip on a strike. Then I paced out 120ft (35mtrs) of line from the rod
tip. At this point I tied on a 15lb test mono stop knot to my 50lb test braid
mainline and secured it with a little super glue. The tails from the stop knot
were left about 2 inches (5cm) long. These tails are to be held by the bulldog
clip, which was attached to the boat's transom with a G clamp when fishing. This
will prevent the lures action overloading the rod, but will release from the
clip when a Pike strikes the lure. I can just about row fast and steadily enough
to keep the lure working at around 2-3 feet deep. First time out fishing with
this set up, and I caught four small Pike of up to about 3lbs. This was very
surprising when you then consider that the lure was about 60-75% the length of
the Pike that it caught. Each fish had taken the front treble, with the second
and tail trebles actually fouling one fish.
Subsequently I have removed both the second treble and the
tail treble. This has not affected the hook rates, because the takes are
violent, and head first. I can only presume that these small Pike will only
attack other Pike head first therefore almost guaranteeing a quick and energy
efficient kill.
The most effective pattern is the green Mackerel, and I
have deduced that this must look something like a smaller Pike and therefore a
decent meal to other larger Pike. This reinforces the cannibal theory and
indicates a possible territorial theory. I own and use lures in Pike pattern,
including, paw-paw Pike getums, psyclone Pike, and Real Image Pike Minnows.
These all produce Pike for me, but interestingly none of these contain a
rattle.
The Pike pattern lures that contain rattles that I own do
not catch Pike for me. On several occasions I have witnessed, both sunbathing
Jack pike, and Jack Pike stalking bait fish suddenly being attacked by larger
pike. Sometimes the Jacks are eaten by their larger cousins. Sometimes they are
mortally wounded, with the attacker probably being startled away by my
excitement, and sometimes the Jacks get clear away. I have formed a two part
conclusion from these observations. The "territorial theory" and the
"vulnerable when feeding theory," I have based both of my conclusions
upon the sonic vibrations given off by panicking bait fish.
Most commercial lure manufacturers build a sonic rattle
into their products to simulate the vibrations given off by a fleeing bait fish.
Therefore any predatory fish stalking a meal will not give off these types of
vibrations. The vibrations that a predatory fish gives off would in my opinion
be much closer to that of a lure not containing a rattle. If a Jack Pike gave
off this panic type of sonic vibration, it would then be advertising its
presence to other larger Pike, and become a targeted meal itself. Therefore, if
a small jack was to occupy the same area as a larger Pike. Not only would be it
seen as a potential meal, but also as a rival for the available food resource.
Survival dictates that you obtain the best possible meal, for the least amount
of energy expended. Not only is a jack Pike normally going to be a larger meal
for a big Pike, but the larger Pike is reducing the competition for a finite
food resource. If a larger than normal lure is presented into the territory of a
Pike that is larger than the Pike pattern lure, not only is it potential food,
but also a potential rival. That is why the heads of the large lures are being
attacked so violently and why the larger lures are so effective at capturing
Pike up to about the 12LB mark. Although I have actually caught Pike of over
15LB on lures. I believe that fish of this size are more of an opportunist
feeder, only striking at lures that pass close to them and that they are more of
a scavenger. Preying upon the dead, and the dying, therefore, not expending
extensive amounts of energy in the pursuit of food. These Pike are possible more
likely to see off a rival from their preferred territory, which requires less
energy. Hence the following without striking at the large lures. I will explain
my conclusions of the "vulnerable while feeding" theory, in another
article.
|